![]() ![]() There are people calling out hypocrisy but they're probably overcompensating for some subconscious inkling that yes, they can see themselves doing this. That Gordon didn't think it was the right thing either until he did. This was a visceral thing, they were appalled because they know they could have done this to. I think the ending suggests they weren't judging Gordon specifically, and they were all very aware that it could have been any one of them doing what that Gordon did. Edit: But were they being extremely angry and vindictive for no reason? No. Should they have been cruel? Probably not. I don't know if them not telling Gordon to get more prenatal checkups was cruel though, since his bio indicates they only have one child. It'd either not matter to them if they stop existing or it'd matter for a very short period of time when they'd be afraid. They were cruel on purpose, obviously, they wanted to punish that Gordon whether or not he stops existing or this timeline is a branch and they keep existing. Ed and Kelly were probably "irrationally" angry because as far as they know, everyone they care about probably never existed. There’s no possible way to not affect the timeline at all, so you still might mess up the timeline and be lonely and insane, as a little cherry on top.Įveryone focusing on Ed and Kelly erasing that kid and not on Gordon probably erasing everyone else in the future. That person then doesn’t eat and starves, which in turn causes some other effects and so on. Even if you somehow managed to live alone, off the grid, maybe you killed a chicken for dinner that was supposed to feed someone else. Whoever wrote that rule cannot be serious. That said, it is also very wild to expect someone to just stay isolated forever to not affect the timeline. It could be sweet, in a romantic comedy kind of way I guess? Part of me would wonder if our dating days were natural or manufactured based on this diary information though. So when I found myself in the same town as you, I sought you out because I knew I liked you based on the diary.”, I think it would put me in a weird space. I don’t know but I’m thinking if one day my partner said, “ Wanna hear a funny story? Before we met, I found your diary and studied it from cover to cover learning everything about and even falling a little bit in love with you. I don’t think it’s exactly comparable to a dating site or social media because he had access to all of her photos, messages, contacts, notes etc, not just things she chose to post on a site. It sets the tone for a great meet and a second date that may or may not have otherwise happened. ![]() So even if he didn’t specifically take her to her favourite place, he may take her somewhere similar because he unconsciously knows already what she likes. Imagine if you had all the knowledge about a person before you met up for a drink, you go to a bar/restaurant you know they like, you order drinks they like, you discuss hobbies they’re into. I know it wasn’t explicitly stated whether or not he used all his phone knowledge to get with Laura but even if he didn’t consciously do it, I think little things may have slipped in. Tom Costantino and Hillary Wills (editor and asst. Links to illegally hosted content, streams and torrents will be removed.ĮPISODES Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Episode
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |